Andrew Brandt reports that Manningโs 2012 salary of $18 million has no injury protection attached to it. However, Manning will have to pass a physical next March in order to activate another $40 million guaranteed.
Jason La Canfora mentioned that the two sides are currently working on the specific language to determine whether or not Manningโs 2013 and 2014 salaries will be guaranteed if he suffers an injury to a different part of his body. His neck is obviously the biggest concern but thereโs always a chance that Manning could suffer a separate injury so it would be wise for the Broncos to try to prevent themselves from being on the hook for $40 million guaranteed.
Either way, this is still an incredible deal for Manning and it really highlights just how much the Broncos wanted to make this happen.
โโโโโโโ-
ESPNโs Adam Schefter reports that the Denver Broncos have reached an agreement with QB Peyton Manning that will pay him $96 million over the course of five-years.
Weโre still waiting to hear what the guaranteed figure is because thatโs the all important number in a contract and even more so in Mannings deal, given the fact that heโs coning off of four neck surgeries.
The contract will average out to $19.2 million per season which is in line with the deal that he received from Indianapolis last year. Whatโs really amazing about this, is that it will surpass Tom Bradyโs contract despite all of the concerns that come with signing him. Weโre talking about a 36-year-old quarterback that sat out all of last season because of a serious neck injury. Itโs obviously rare to be in a situation where you can sign a guy like Petyon Manning, but Denver has to protect themselves to some degree.
Weโll have more as soon as the information is available.
Looking for the latest NFL Insider News & Rumors?
Be sure to follow NFL Trade Rumors on X.com and FACEBOOK for breaking NFL News and Rumors for all 32 teams!
โin order to active another $40 millionโ. Where did you guys get your education?
I apologize for the errors in some of our articles this morning. Itโs inexcusable to post content thatโs filled with errors as it reflects poorly on the site as a whole. Weโll work to make the necessary corrections in the coming days.
Thanks for taking the time to point some of them out.
Brgds
-Nate