Report: Bengals Unlikely To Match Browns’ Offers Sheet For WR Andrew Hawkins

 

Update

Albert Breer reports that the Cincinnati Bengals are “unlikely” to match the offer sheet the Browns signedย restricted free agent WRย Andrew Hawkinsย to earlier today.

  • According to Breer, the Bengals rethought the situation and are expected to pass on matching the offer sheet.
  • Ian Rapoportย reported that Hawkins has signed the Browns’ four-year, $13.6 million offer sheet.

Hawkins, 28, received an original round tender from the Bengals, which means the Browns wouldn’t have to part with draft compensation to sign him away from the Bengals.

Cincinnati has five days to make a decision as to whether or not they will match Cleveland’s offer sheet.

  • ESPN’sย Adam Schefterย previously reported that theย Bengals plan on matching the Browns’ย offer sheet for Hawkins.

He has flashed some ability during three seasons with the Bengals.ย Hawkins began the year on injured reserve with anย ankle injury, but managed to return and finish the season with 12 receptions forย 199 yards receiving over the course of eight games.

———–

  • The Browns signedย Hawkins to a four-year offer sheet worth $12.2 million that includes $5.3 million guaranteed.

———–

Aditi Kinkhabwala of the NFL Network reports thatย Browns offer to WR Andrew Hawkins includes guarantees that are three times greater than the Bengal’s $1.45 million tender.

  • According to Kinkhabwala‘s source, it’sย unlikely the Bengals match the Browns offer.

————-

ESPN’s Adam Schefter reports that theย Browns are signing Bengals RFA WR Andrew Hawkins to an offer sheet.

 

 

Looking for the latest NFL Insider News & Rumors?

Be sure to follow NFL Trade Rumors on TWITTER and FACEBOOK for breaking NFL News and Rumors for all 32 teams!

3 COMMENTS

  1. Ready to work? What a dumb comment, baby hawk worked his ass off for 3 seasons. He got hurt, thats why his numbers r low. Cleveland should be kissing cincys a$$ for developing such a solid work horse. U wont be unhappy for long

Leave a Reply